Sunday, October 26, 2025
- Advertisement -
More
    Home Blog Page 13

    OpenAI cautions users: GPT-5 is powerful but not infallible

    • Despite ongoing improvements, ChatGPT should remain a “second opinion” tool—not a definitive source of truth.

    OpenAI’s latest language model, GPT-5, has taken a significant leap in power and precision compared to earlier versions, but users are being cautioned not to place blind trust in its responses.

    Nick Turley, Head of ChatGPT, recently underscored the fact that despite ongoing improvements, ChatGPT should remain a “second opinion” tool—not a definitive source of truth.

    Turley, speaking with The Verge, was candid about the persistent issue of AI hallucinations. Even with advances in the underlying technology, GPT-5 occasionally generates information that appears convincing yet is factually incorrect.

    OpenAI’s own assessments indicate that the model still produces wrong answers roughly 10 per cent of the time—an improvement, but not perfection.

    Turley highlighted the complexity of the task: “Achieving total reliability is a massive challenge,” he said.

    He made it clear that as long as language models lag behind human experts in their accuracy across all domains, OpenAI will continue to suggest users double-check the AI’s advice. “Until we are provably more reliable than a human expert across all domains, we’ll continue to advise users to double-check the answers,” Turley noted.

    For now, ChatGPT is best seen as a supplement—an extra set of eyes on complicated questions, not the only authority.

    Why errors still happen

    Large language models like GPT-5 generate answers by recognising patterns in enormous text datasets. This allows them to excel at natural, humanlike conversation, but it also means they can present incorrect facts on topics that aren’t well-represented in their training data, or even invent plausible-sounding details that aren’t true.

    To help users catch any slip-ups, OpenAI has equipped ChatGPT with search functionality—making it easier to verify answers by cross-referencing with trustworthy external sources.

    Turley was optimistic about eventual solutions but tempered expectations by admitting that eliminating hallucinations will take time: “I’m confident we’ll eventually solve hallucinations, and I’m confident we’re not going to do it in the next quarter.”

    Despite these challenges, OpenAI isn’t slowing its ambitions. Reports indicate the company is working on launching its own web browser, while CEO Sam Altman has even made tongue-in-cheek remarks about potentially buying Google Chrome if it ever came onto the market. Clearly, OpenAI intends to expand well beyond chatbots and continue shaping the way people interact with information online.

    Foxconn ramps up iPhone 17 production at India plant

    • Foxconn fills critical technical gaps by bringing in experts from Taiwan and elsewhere after the unexpected departure of several Chinese engineers.
    • For the year ended March 31, 2025, Apple assembled 60% more iPhones in India, representing a market value of about $22b.

    Foxconn, the Taiwanese electronics behemoth and Apple’s principal manufacturing partner, has officially kicked off production of the iPhone 17 at its new, state-of-the-art facility in Bengaluru.

    After months of anticipation and a massive investment of around $2.8 billion (approximately Rs25,000 crore), this development signals a new chapter for India’s role in Apple’s global supply chain.

    The iPhone 17 series launch dates have been rumoured to be in early September, likely on September 9.

    The Devanahalli-based unit now stands as Foxconn’s second-largest iPhone plant outside China, supplementing output from the company’s long-established Chennai factory. Both locations are currently humming with activity as they manufacture the latest iPhone 17 series.

    The achievement echoes Foxconn’s recent momentum after last year’s local iPhone 16 production, which had also preceded the phone’s global and Indian debuts.

    Sources familiar with internal operations suggest the Bengaluru plant has quickly rebounded from earlier hiccups, including the unexpected departure of several Chinese engineers. Foxconn’s ability to fill critical technical gaps by bringing in experts from Taiwan and elsewhere has been key to keeping production on track.

    Apple’s bet on India

    Apple is now doubling down on India as a manufacturing powerhouse. Projections estimate iPhone output will reach a staggering 60 million units this calendar year—significantly up from the 35–40 million units produced during 2024–25.

    For the year ended March 31, 2025, Apple assembled 60 per cent more iPhones in India, representing a market value of about $22 billion.

    Apple’s CEO Tim Cook has publicly recognised India’s rising profile. Following the company’s July 31 financial results, Cook highlighted that most iPhones sold in the US in June 2025 were made in India.

    During the June quarter’s earnings call, he noted that all iPhones shipped to the US from India during that timeframe—a major shift in Apple’s supply chain dynamics.

    Scaling production to meet demand

    S&P Global’s data reveals that iPhone sales in the US reached 75.9 million units in 2024. With Indian exports of iPhones hitting 3.1 million units in March 2025 alone, Apple will need to dramatically ramp up capacity at its Indian facilities or reroute more devices intended for Indian consumers to international markets.

    Meanwhile, Apple’s footprint in India’s burgeoning smartphone market continues to expand. During the first half of 2025, sales climbed 21.5 per cent year-on-year to 5.9 million units, led by the iPhone 16 as the best-selling model.

    The June quarter further cemented Apple’s momentum, with YoY shipments soaring nearly 20 per cent, giving the brand a 7.5 per cent share of India’s smartphone market.

    Despite these gains, Chinese OEMs continue to dominate the broader Indian market. IDC’s data places Vivo at the top with a 19 per cent share for the June quarter, underscoring the competitive landscape Apple faces.

    DeepSeek and the global shift in open-source AI revolution

    • DeepSeek proved that transformative innovation need not be limited to one geography, language, or company—and that knowledge, once shared freely, multiplies in unpredictable ways.
    • The promise of open AI cracked open a spirited, sometimes fierce debate: which is safer and wiser—the freedom of the crowd, or the guardrails of the few?
    • Open-source AI isn’t just a technological leap; it is compressing costs, catalysing new forms of innovation, and shifting where value—economic, societal, and political—will flow in the coming decades.
    • Data, integration, governance—these will be the battlegrounds of tomorrow’s AI economy.

    Once upon a time, in the looming shadow of Silicon Valley, artificial intelligence looked like a lush private garden—vibrant with promise, but walled off for the privileged few.

    For years, American powerhouses like OpenAI and Google poured billions into crafting towering models, all secretive code and legal barricades. Many onlookers assumed only the largest, wealthiest tech giants could truly orchestrate the future of AI.

    Across the Pacific, however, a spark of rebellion glimmered. DeepSeek, a young and audacious startup from China, dared to imagine a world where AI would be a shared resource rather than a fortified treasure.

    Its mission was nothing short of radical: break open the locked gates of AI and let the light spill out for everyone.

    Fueled by this vision, DeepSeek’s engineers persisted with relentless energy, building models like DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-V3—rivalling their Western counterparts not just in raw intelligence, but in core efficiency. They obsessed over optimisation, turning every dollar and hour into sharper algorithms and smaller, faster footprints.

    But DeepSeek didn’t just keep its research inhouse or erect any artificial boundaries. In a move that startled the world, it published its models—without restrictions, usage caveats, or hidden fees.

    No “research only” fine print. Coders in Mumbai, creatives in Nairobi, and entrepreneurs from São Paulo to Sydney suddenly found themselves empowered with best-in-class AI tools, liberated from the corporate stronghold of American tech behemoths.

    DeepSeek’s open gamble

    The impact was immediate. DeepSeek-R1, to the world’s astonishment, shot above even ChatGPT in the US app charts for a time. The old status quo began to crack. Tech giants scrambled: some released hurried, less-restricted models, trying to ride DeepSeek’s momentum.

    Markets shivered as investors began to worry that open-source disruption would erode the fat monopolies of the past.

    By stripping away all the old, costly hurdles—expensive licenses, tight legal leashes—DeepSeek re-leveled the playing field. Now, with models trained for just $5 million—a fraction of the hundreds of millions spent by rivals—startups, hobbyists, and researchers everywhere could join the AI race in earnest.

    That leap in efficiency threatened to trigger the so-called “Jevons paradox” in AI: as costs plummet and access widens, adoption will surge in previously unimaginable ways.

    DeepSeek’s open gamble forced responses even from the incumbents. OpenAI, after a long hiatus, finally released an open model—evidence that the open-source wave was becoming inescapable. China’s rise via DeepSeek was not just symbolic; it marked a real-world shift in the balance of technological power and innovation.

    But this new era of openness also brought dilemmas. Policymakers and security experts sounded alarms—could free and universal access to potent models enable cyberattacks, disinformation spree, or even mass manipulation?

    Catalysing new forms of innovation

    The promise of open AI cracked open a spirited, sometimes fierce debate: which is safer and wiser—the freedom of the crowd, or the guardrails of the few?

    The genie, of course, refused to return to the bottle. DeepSeek proved that transformative innovation need not be limited to one geography, language, or company—and that knowledge, once shared freely, multiplies in unpredictable ways. AI, once a playground for the privileged, had become everyone’s tool.

    As new voices joined the fray and new ideas blossomed, the future of intelligence suddenly belonged not to an elite, but to the world at large.

    Open-source AI isn’t just a technological leap; it is compressing costs, catalysing new forms of innovation, and shifting where value—economic, societal, and political—will flow in the coming decades.

    Data, integration, governance—these will be the battlegrounds of tomorrow’s AI economy. For now, with DeepSeek’s revolution as a beacon, humanity stands on the threshold of an age where brilliance is a birthright, not a privilege.

    Accenture makes largest cybersecurity acquisition with CyberCX

    Accenture has announced plans to acquire CyberCX, a premier cybersecurity provider headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, in a move that marks its largest-ever cybersecurity acquisition.

    The bold step to reinforce Accenture’s capabilities throughout Asia Pacific, significantly strengthening its support for both public and private sector clients amid rapidly intensifying cyber threats and regulatory complexities.

    CyberCX, founded in 2019, has positioned itself as a leader in the region, with a skilled team of roughly 1,400 professionals. The company’s broad suite of services covers everything from consulting and transformation to managed security services, and is renowned for expertise in areas such as offensive security, cyber-physical security, incident response, threat intelligence, and strategic advisory.

    Additionally, CyberCX operates a sophisticated network of security operations centers across Australia and New Zealand, with additional footprints in London and New York, ensuring a blend of local insight and global reach.

    Strong reputation

    A cornerstone of CyberCX’s value proposition is its portfolio of innovative, AI-driven security platforms, which include managed detection and response, sovereign secure cloud solutions, a dedicated CyberCX Academy for talent development, and proprietary cyber intelligence and testing tools.

    Its established ecosystem partnerships with heavyweights like Microsoft, CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto Networks underscore its strong reputation, along with a remarkable 2,600+ professional certifications among its personnel.

    The timing of Accenture’s acquisition is critical. According to Accenture’s recent State of Cybersecurity Resilience report for 2025, a vast majority—97 per cent—of Australian organisations remain unprepared to safeguard their AI-powered infrastructures, with around 80 per cent falling short in vital data and AI cybersecurity competencies needed to protect evolving digital environments.

    Digital threats

    Paolo Dal Cin, Global Lead for Accenture Cybersecurity, highlighted the synergy between the two organisations, noting that their combined strengths in agentic AI and deep-rooted market relationships will help turn cybersecurity into a true strategic advantage for clients throughout Asia Pacific.

    Peter Burns, the regional head for Accenture Australia and New Zealand, added that as organisations grapple with the expanding scope of digital threats and connected ecosystems, the need for robust and responsible cybersecurity governance is more urgent than ever—especially as AI and quantum technologies mature.

    John Paitaridis, CEO of CyberCX, expressed pride in the company’s achievements and excitement about joining Accenture’s global network: This union, he said, creates a force multiplier, enabling the delivery of world-class cybersecurity solutions to even more clients and accelerating growth across the region.

    The acquisition is just the latest in Accenture’s campaign to grow its cybersecurity portfolio. Since 2015, the company has snapped up 20 cybersecurity firms—recently including Morphus, MNEMO Mexico, and Innotec Security—demonstrating an ongoing commitment to strengthening its global leadership in digital defense.

    The terms of the CyberCX deal remain confidential, and closing of the transaction is subject to standard regulatory approvals and closing conditions.

    Apple resumes blood oxygen feature on select watches after legal battle approval

    0
    • US Customs gives green light to reintroduce the feature, as long as it’s delivered through a software update rather than pre-installed hardware.

    Apple has officially reinstated the blood oxygen measurement feature to several of its smartwatch models following approval from US authorities, ending a drawn-out legal standoff that has shadowed its wearable lineup for years.

    Now, users with Apple Watch Series 9, Series 10, and Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the United States can monitor their blood oxygen levels using their paired iPhones—thanks to a new software update.

    The update comes on the heels of a prolonged dispute with rival medical device company Masimo, which previously accused Apple of poaching employees and misappropriating pulse oximetry technology after initial talks of a partnership went sour.

    The legal wrangle escalated to a decisive victory for Masimo at the US International Trade Commission (ITC), resulting in an import ban on Apple’s watches bundled with the contested feature.

    Faced with the ruling, Apple removed blood oxygen tracking from its recently shipped smartwatches, a decision that brought widespread attention from both consumers and the tech industry.

    However, Apple pressed on, seeking a way forward through the appeals process. In a significant turn, US Customs gave the green light to reintroduce the feature, as long as it’s delivered through a software update rather than pre-installed hardware.

    With the latest update, users can initiate a session in the Blood Oxygen app on their Apple Watch; the sensors then collect the relevant data, and the paired iPhone processes and displays the blood oxygen measurement.

    The software-based workaround marks the first time since the Series 6 that American users can access this health tool, after its removal during the peak of the ITC dispute.

    The contest between Apple and Masimo is still ongoing, with Masimo’s own W1 watch—launched in 2022—competing directly in the health-oriented tech market. Although the legal battle temporarily barred the import and sale of certain Apple models, strategic legal maneuvres allowed Apple to keep its products on shelves intermittently as the appeals played out.

    Ultimately, this saga underscores both the complexity of global patent law and the high stakes involved in consumer health technology innovation.

    Consumers, for now, can once again use their Apple Watches to track a key health metric, all while tech giants jostle in the legal and innovation arena.

    Russia blocks video and voice calls on WhatsApp

    • Officials promote a new state-controlled platform, MAX, that promises “seamless integration with government services.
    • WhatsApp and Telegram had been lifelines for secure conversations — protected by end-to-end encryption that kept prying eyes away.

    It was a warm August evening in Moscow when Anna tried to call her brother in St. Petersburg on WhatsApp. The familiar ringing tone never came — instead, just a faint metallic buzz, then silence. She frowned, checked her internet, and tried Telegram instead. No luck.

    Across the city, millions were having the same problem. For years, WhatsApp and Telegram had been lifelines for secure conversations — protected by end-to-end encryption that kept prying eyes away. Now, suddenly, voices were going silent.

    The official explanation came swiftly:
    The government accused these foreign-owned platforms of refusing to share user data with law enforcement — data they said was vital for fighting fraud and terrorism. Until they complied, calls would remain disrupted.

    Messages, voice notes, and text chats still worked for now, but video and voice calls were becoming painfully unreliable.

    Digital sovereignty

    Behind the scenes, though, the situation was bigger than just phone calls. Since the war in Ukraine, Moscow had been building a tighter, more controlled internet — what they called “digital sovereignty.” Facebook and Instagram were gone. YouTube’s speed had been choked to a crawl. Now, the crackdown was hitting messaging apps.

    Officials were promoting a new state-controlled platform, MAX, that promised “seamless integration with government services.” Politicians urged citizens to migrate there, touting its convenience. Critics whispered that MAX would track everything users did and said.

    In July, surveys showed just how beloved these “foreign” apps still were: 97 million Russians used WhatsApp every month, 90 million used Telegram. The scale of the call restrictions meant virtually every household felt the impact — from friends catching up, to parents calling children abroad.

    Rights groups called it deliberate throttling, the latest step in carving out a Russian internet walled off from the rest of the world. Officials called it security. WhatsApp vowed to keep encrypted communication alive “for people everywhere, including Russia.” Telegram insisted it was fighting harmful content daily.

    Anna didn’t know about the political statements, or the public data. She just wanted to talk to her brother. That night, after trying in vain once more, she sighed and typed him a message instead:

    “Call’s not working again. I’ll try tomorrow.”

    Tomorrow might come — but for Russians like Anna, the days of easy, private calling were already fading into the past.

    Countries that have blocked WhatsApp

    • China — WhatsApp has been blocked since 2017 as part of the Great Firewall, pushing users to domestic alternatives like WeChat.
    • North Korea — Generally inaccessible due to the country’s heavily restricted internet; major foreign platforms are banned.
    • Iran —Imposed bans and intermittent restrictions, especially during periods of unrest.
    • Syria — Reported as banned/restricted in government-controlled contexts as part of broader censorship.
    • United Arab Emirates — Texting works, but VoIP (voice/video) calls are blocked as a policy; some temporary allowances occurred during events like Expo 2020.
    • Qatar — VoIP calls restricted; messaging still works.
    • Some reports add Saudi Arabia and Egypt as places where WhatsApp voice/video calls have been restricted at times, while texting remains available; enforcement has varied over time and by carrier.