Home Blog Page 114

Revoult seeks to obtain full banking licence in UAE

  • Submits applications to Central Bank of the UAE to become an electronic-money institution, thereby enabling it to offer remittance services within the country.
  • Aims to capture a market characterised by a significant expatriate population and a burgeoning remittance industry.

UK-based fintech firm Revolut Ltd is making significant strides in its international expansion by seeking licenses to operate in the Middle East, specifically in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The company has submitted applications to the Central Bank of the UAE to become an electronic-money institution, thereby enabling it to offer remittance services within the country.

The initiative marks a crucial step toward Revolut’s long-term objective of acquiring a full banking license, akin to the one recently granted by UK regulators after extensive efforts.

With a customer base of nine million in the UK, Revolut boasts a substantial advantage over traditional banks such as Metro Bank Holdings Plc. However, the company recognises the necessity of geographic diversification to increase its user base further.

Revolut’s foray into the UAE is indicative of this strategy, as it aims to capture a market characterised by a significant expatriate population and a burgeoning remittance industry.

Hiring staff

The establishment of an office in the UAE in 2022 and the recruitment of a workforce of 140, many of whom were displaced from Ukraine due to the ongoing conflict, highlight the company’s commitment to this region.

Nik Storonsky, Revolut’s CEO, has been an ardent advocate for expansion into the Gulf region. Historically, the lack of necessary licenses has prevented UAE residents from opening accounts with Revolut.

However, the current licensing efforts signal a turning point for the company.

In addition to its ambitions in the UAE, Revolut is also exploring opportunities in neighbouring Saudi Arabia, further solidifying its intent to become a global banking entity.

The company is actively seeking to bolster its presence in the UAE by hiring key personnel, including a head of finance and a head of legal for the region, as well as filling various roles in compliance and product development. This recruitment drive underscores Revolut’s strategic focus on establishing a robust operational framework in the Middle East.

Revolut’s expansion aligns with broader UK governmental efforts to strengthen trade relations with the UAE, which is home to substantial sovereign wealth.

As UK ministers seek to attract UAE investment in British projects, Revolut’s initiatives may serve to facilitate these diplomatic and economic engagements.

The company has previously leveraged similar opportunities, as evidenced by its banking license acquisition in Mexico following UK-Mexico trade discussions.

The firm is also planning to expand in India, another strategic market for the UK’s trade plans.

Proposed Vodafone-Three merger will happen but likely in 2025

  • Merger could make it harder for MVNOs to secure competitive deals which may reduce their ability to offer competitive rates to customers.
  • CMA will explore potential solutions to its concerns before final decision by December 7.
  • CMA is soliciting input on potential remedies to address its significant competition concerns.

The prospective £16.5 billion telecom merger between Vodafone UK and CK Hutchison’s Three UK represents a watershed moment in the UK telecommunications landscape, a sector already characterised by rapid evolution and intense competition.

The merger, anticipated to create a dominant mobile network operator with a combined customer base of 27 million, is now facing delays pushing into 2025, Dario Betti, CEO of the Mobile Ecosystem Forum, said.

“Vodafone and Three UK argue that the merger would actually strengthen competition by creating a stronger third player, capable of challenging market leaders like BT’s EE and Virgin Media O2.”

However, the primary concern identified by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is that the merger could adversely affect both pricing structures and service quality for consumers, posing significant questions about the future of competition within the market.

Intricate balancing act

“The CMA’s cautious stance reflects an intricate balancing act between the need for competitive pricing and the pressing demand for investment in infrastructure—particularly in advancing 5G networks,” Betti said.

Dario Betti, CEO of Mobile Ecosystem Forum
Dario Betti, CEO of Mobile Ecosystem Forum.

The regulator’s provisional findings from a comprehensive investigation suggest that the merger could lead to increased costs for mobile customers or a downgrade in service provisions, particularly detrimental to the most vulnerable demographics.

The reduction in the number of mobile network operators from four to three raises substantial concerns regarding increased market consolidation and its impact on retail and wholesale markets, particularly for Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs).

Stuart McIntosh, chair of the inquiry group, said that the CMA has meticulously weighed the potential benefits of enhanced network quality against the risks of diminished competition.

This prudence is commendable; however, it raises fundamental questions regarding the regulatory framework guiding telecommunications in the UK.

As Betti aptly noted, this situation invokes a broader discourse: Should telecom services be regulated similarly to utility services, focusing on price control, or should they embrace a more liberalised market where innovation thrives unchecked?

Rising communication costs

A critical aspect of this debate is the emergence of Big Tech companies, which are increasingly integral to the telecommunications ecosystem, overshadowing traditional mobile service providers.

Additionally, Betti highlights the inevitability of rising communication costs, driven by the growing demand for advanced technologies within Europe.

“The pressing inquiry is not merely whether consumer bills will escalate but rather who will be the beneficiaries of these payments—traditional mobile operators or internet-based companies. This distinction underscores a significant shift in how telecommunication services might be conceptualised and delivered moving forward.”

Comparative analysis with other European telecom markets, such as Vodafone Italia’s prospective sale to Fastweb, he said reinforces the notion that the shifting dynamics of telecom mergers are not confined to the UK.

The ongoing deliberations in various jurisdictions presage a tide of transformative changes across the industry. The anticipated Vodafone-Three merger, along with similar proposed consolidations, signals a reorientation within the communications sector that warrants close examination.

Potential remedies

In light of its preliminary findings, the CMA is soliciting input on potential remedies to address its significant competition concerns. These concerns revolve around the potential impact of the merger on both retail and wholesale customers, as well as the overarching competitive landscape in the telecommunications sector.

One of the principal remedies under consideration includes legally binding investment commitments, which would be monitored by the sector regulator. Such measures are crucial to ensuring that the merger not only complies with regulatory standards but also fosters a competitive environment that benefits consumers.

The CMA emphasises the importance of protecting retail customers—who directly experience the effects of market consolidation—as well as wholesale customers, who play a vital role in the supply chain.

The CMA has made it clear that it retains the authority to prohibit the merger should it determine that no suitable remedy can sufficiently alleviate its competition concerns.

This underscores the gravity of the situation and the imperative of securing competitive market conditions. As expressed by McIntosh, the CMA will rigorously evaluate how Vodafone and Three can mitigate its concerns while simultaneously working towards the potential long-term benefits of the merger, including the assurance of future network investments.

To facilitate a thorough review, the CMA has set deadlines for collaborative inputs, inviting responses to its provisional findings by October 4, 2024, and feedback on possible remedies by September 27, 2024. These contributions will play an essential role in shaping the final report, which is slated for release by December 7, 2024.

Nazara buys 47.7% stake in Moonshine Technology for Rs832cr

  • Nazara set to inject an additional Rs150cr in primary capital into Moonshine via compulsory convertible preference shares.

In a significant development within the Indian gaming industry, Nazara Technologies Limited has announced its acquisition of a 47.7 per cent stake in Moonshine Technology Private Limited (MTPL), the parent company of PokerBaazi, for a valuation of Rs832 crores through a secondary transaction.

The investment underscores Nazara’s commitment to solidifying its position as a leading diversified gaming platform in India. Along with this acquisition, Nazara is set to inject an additional Rs150 crores in primary capital into Moonshine via compulsory convertible preference shares, demonstrating a robust strategy to enhance both operational capabilities and market reach.

PokerBaazi, a cornerstone of Moonshine’s business operations, is the primary driver of the company’s financial performance, contributing over 85 per cent of net revenue.

Taking gaming to next level

As of May 2024, PokerBaazi boasts approximately 340,000 monthly active users, making it a significant player in the online poker landscape. The platform has been lauded for its innovation, user engagement, and overall gaming experience, establishing itself as the leading authority in online poker gaming in India.

Alongside PokerBaazi, Moonshine’s fantasy sports platform, SportsBaazi, contributes 12 per cent to its net revenue, reflecting the company’s diverse approach to catering to various gaming interests among users.

The strategic acquisition has been met with optimism from both parties involved. Nitish Mittersain, CEO of Nazara Technologies, expressed his enthusiasm, stating, “This investment in Moonshine Technology represents a significant step in our journey to strengthen Nazara’s position as India’s dominant diversified gaming platform.”

Mittersain’s remarks highlight not only the importance of PokerBaazi’s leadership in the online poker segment but also the collective ambition shared between Nazara and Moonshine to elevate Indian gaming on both domestic and global stages.

The partnership posits Nazara as a key player in shaping the future of gaming in India, particularly as the industry gains momentum and recognition.

Navkiran Singh, CEO and Founder of Baazi Games, echoed this sentiment, emphasising the importance of collaboration in advancing the Indian gaming ecosystem. Singh articulated a vision for growth, asserting that the partnership with Nazara is crucial for achieving global expansion within the gaming sector.

His reference to the Prime Minister’s acknowledgment of the gaming industry’s potential in contributing to India’s digital economy further solidifies the importance of this venture.

The combined resources of Nazara and Moonshine Technology are expected to foster innovation, create employment opportunities, and firmly establish India’s presence in the expanding global digital economy.

The gaming industry in India is witnessing unprecedented growth, driven by increasing digital penetration, evolving consumer preferences, and supportive regulatory developments.

Nazara’s investment in Moonshine represents not only a strategic maneuver to enhance its portfolio but also a significant contribution to the overall advancement of the sector.

The collaboration between Nazara and Moonshine is poised to set new benchmarks in user engagement and innovation, thereby enriching the gaming experience for users across India.

Fortinet admits hackers steal 440GB of customers’ cloud data

  • Breach was publicly detailed by “Fortibitch” on a hacking forum, where the threat actor publicised their claim to have stolen data and shared credentials linking to an alleged storage location for this information.
  • Company says the incident impacted less than 0.3% of its customer base and did not lead to any malicious activity targeting customers.
  • Firm emphasised that there has been no evidence of data encryption or ransomware involvement, nor was there unauthorised access to Fortinet’s corporate network.

Company has maintained that its core operations, products, and services remain unaffected by the breach.

The confirmation by cybersecurity giant Fortinet of a significant data breach has raised alarm bells within the cybersecurity community and among its customers.

The breach, allegedly perpetrated by a threat actor known as “Fortibitch,” involved the theft of approximately 440GB of files from Fortinet’s Microsoft SharePoint server.

The incident not only highlights the vulnerabilities that persist even within organisations dedicated to cybersecurity but also underscores the evolving tactics employed by cybercriminals in the digital landscape.

Fortinet is renowned for its comprehensive suite of cybersecurity products, including firewalls, routers, and VPN devices, as well as advanced solutions in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), network management, and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR).

Raises eyebrows

The company’s prominence in the cybersecurity sector renders the breach particularly concerning, as it raises questions about the efficacy of security protocols even among industry leaders.

The breach was publicly detailed by “Fortibitch” on a hacking forum, where the threat actor publicised their claim to have stolen data and shared credentials linking to an alleged storage location for this information.

While the breach reportedly affected customers primarily within the Asia-Pacific region, Fortinet’s acknowledgment of the incident alludes to a broader implication regarding the security of cloud-based storage solutions.

Fortinet confirmed that the unauthorised access originated from a “third-party cloud-based shared file drive,” resulting in the compromise of limited data associated with a small number of customers.

Related Posts:

Notably, the company stated that the incident impacted less than 0.3 per cent of its customer base and did not lead to any malicious activity targeting customers.

Fortinet’s public communications following the breach have sought to reassure stakeholders. The firm emphasised that there has been no evidence of data encryption or ransomware involvement, nor was there unauthorised access to Fortinet’s corporate network.

Zero-day vulnerabilities

Furthermore, the company has maintained that its core operations, products, and services remain unaffected by the breach. Fortinet’s prompt engagement with the affected customers and its ongoing monitoring of the situation reflect a commitment to transparency and customer safety, which is critical in maintaining trust in the cybersecurity field.

However, this incident represents a troubling trend in the cybersecurity landscape.

Fortinet is not unfamiliar with security incidents, having faced breaches in the past, including exploitation of vulnerabilities in its products by threat actors.

For instance, in May 2023, a breach involving the GitHub repositories of Panopta, a company acquired by Fortinet, resulted in the leak of sensitive data. Additionally, reports have highlighted previous exploits of zero-day vulnerabilities within Fortinet’s security solutions.

As cybercriminals continue to adapt and refine their tactics, it is crucial for organisations—even those operating in the cybersecurity sector—to enhance their defensive measures and remain vigilant against potential threats.

Amazon and Flipkart breach e-commerce antitrust laws in India

  • CCI report asserts that both companies established an ecosystem where preferred sellers, bolstered by specific business arrangements, gained an upper hand in online visibility and listings.
  • Confederation of All India Traders welcomes CCI’s investigation, indicating that the findings will be escalated to federal government for further action.
  • Probe signals a potential shift towards enhanced protection for smaller retailers and a more equitable marketplace.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has concluded that American e-commerce giants Amazon and Walmart’s Flipkart have violated local competition laws by giving preference to select sellers on their shopping websites.

The CCI’s findings, detailed in extensive reports spanning 1,027 pages for Amazon and 1,696 pages for Flipkart, paint a concerning picture of entrenched practices, thereby undermining fair competition in the marketplace.

Initiated in 2020 in response to a complaint from the Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh—a prominent trade body that represents approximately 80 million retailers—the investigation sought to ascertain whether Amazon and Flipkart were engaging in anti-competitive practices.

The CCI report, as reported by Reuters,  asserts that both companies established an ecosystem where preferred sellers, bolstered by specific business arrangements, gained an upper hand in online visibility and listings.

The reports concluded that ordinary sellers were relegated to the status of mere database entries, effectively marginalising them and stifling healthy competition.

Central to the CCI’s findings is the allegation that these e-commerce platforms provided preferential treatment in search result rankings, allowing a select group of sellers to dominate visibility.

Smaller retailers shunned

The prioritisation facilitated deep discounts on products, particularly mobile phones, leading to detrimental effects on smaller retailers trying to compete in a price-sensitive market.

In their analysis, the CCI highlighted that such practices not only contravene local competition laws but also contribute to a broader market dynamic that endangers the viability of numerous small businesses.

Both Amazon and Flipkart have denied any wrongdoing, asserting that their operational practices adhere to Indian law.

The companies are now reviewing the CCI reports and are expected to file objections before any potential fines are levied. Their previous denials of misconduct align with ongoing controversies in the United States, where the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has also accused Amazon of employing anti-competitive strategies to maintain its market dominance.

Transparency needed

The parallel investigations in both countries underscore a growing scrutiny of the competitive practices of major tech companies.

The significance of the CCI’s findings extends beyond regulatory compliance; they reflect a growing discontent among traditional retailers regarding the aggressive discounting strategies employed by e-commerce platforms.

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has welcomed the CCI’s investigation, indicating that the findings will be escalated to the federal government for further action.

The grassroots support highlights the broader implications of the inquiry, suggesting that smaller retailers may seek greater protections in the face of increasingly dominant online competitors.

As India’s e-retail market, valued at approximately  $57−$60 billion in 2023, is projected to soar to over $160 billion by 2028, the stakes are high for all stakeholders involved.

Amazon in June last year said it will increase its Indian investment to $26 billion by 2030, including for its cloud business. It is also targeting merchandise exports worth $20 billion from India by 2025.

The findings set forth by the CCI compel a reevaluation of how e-commerce giants operate within this burgeoning market, particularly concerning their relationships with smaller sellers.

If the CCI’s conclusions catalyse, legislative changes or lead to more stringent enforcement of competition laws, the ramifications could reshape the landscape of e-commerce in India, compelling larger players to adopt more transparent and equitable business practices.

Even though Flipkart and Amazon tried for months to block the investigation in courts, the Supreme Court allowed it to go ahead in 2021.

UK classifies data centres as ‘Critical National Infrastructure’

  • It indicates a progressive shift in governmental policy towards greater protection of digital infrastructure.
  • UK government aims to foster an environment of improved coordination and cooperation in the face of cyber threats and unexpected challenges.

    In an era characterised by rapid digitalisation, the United Kingdom’s decision to classify data centres as “Critical National Infrastructure” (CNI) signifies a pivotal moment in enhancing national cybersecurity. The initiative, the first of its kind in nearly a decade, aligns data centres with other essential services such as water and energy, thereby underscoring their fundamental role in the nation’s operational ecosystem.

The government’s designation aims to bolster protective measures against escalating cyber threats, which have increasingly jeopardised crucial sectors of society, including healthcare and financial services.

The announcement, made by UK Technology Minister Peter Kyle, indicates a progressive shift in governmental policy towards greater protection of digital infrastructure.

Data centres, which serve as the backbone of the UK’s communications systems, will now receive enhanced support and safeguards against cyberattacks. The decisive action is particularly relevant in light of recent incidents that exposed vulnerabilities within such facilities.

For instance, the CrowdStrike outage in July significantly disrupted health services across the country, highlighting the immediate need for robust cybersecurity frameworks.

The government’s move to designate data centres as CNI is intended not only to safeguard sensitive information—ranging from personal data to critical health records—but also to reassure corporations concerned about the security of their investments in UK data facilities.

The implications of this designation are profound. By placing data centres on equal footing with traditional critical services, the UK government aims to foster an environment of improved coordination and cooperation in the face of cyber threats and unexpected challenges.

Proactive approach

Establishing a dedicated CNI data infrastructure team of senior officials is a strategic component of this initiative, providing enhanced monitoring and response capabilities against potential threats.

The proactive approach will ensure that data centres possess prioritised access to security agencies, such as the National Cyber Security Centre, thereby streamlining efforts to mitigate risks and enhance incident response.

Moreover, the designation is expected to bolster investment confidence in the data centre sector, which already generates an estimated £4.6 billion in revenues annually. The investment by Amazon Web Services, amounting to £8 billion over the next five years, further underscores the growing importance of this sector and the government’s commitment to creating a secure infrastructure for digital operations.

With the CNI status, companies like DC01UK, which is proposing a significant investment for Europe’s largest data centre, can proceed with greater assurance, knowing that their infrastructure will be fortified against potential disruptions.

Ransomware attacks

The critical nature of safeguarding digital infrastructure is further emphasised by real-world examples of cyber vulnerabilities impacting essential services.

The ransomware attack on Synnovis, a private firm handling blood test analyses for London hospitals, serves as a stark reminder of the potential ramifications of IT failures.

The incident not only jeopardised medical operations but also brought about serious complications in emergency healthcare services.

Similarly, the CrowdStrike outage disrupted the management of sensitive patient data across a substantial percentage of general practices, illustrating how cyber threats could lead to severe consequences for public health and safety.

Cross border deals

As the UK embraces this new CNI designation, it is crucial to recognise that data storage and digital infrastructure transcend national borders.

The interconnectedness of global digital networks necessitates a comprehensive understanding of cybersecurity threats, requiring international cooperation and collaboration.

As Bruce Owen, UK MD of digital infrastructure provider Equinix, noted, the digital infrastructure has become as vital to daily life as traditional utilities. Thus, ensuring its resilience against potential threats is not only a national priority but also a global imperative.

The UK is currently home to the highest number of data centres in Western Europe.

“As we bring data centres into the spotlight, we need to remember that modern data storage isn’t limited to one country,” Toby Lewis, Global Head of Threat Analysis at global cybersecurity firm Darktrace, said.

Any new rules will need to work across borders, he said and added that many data centres serve multiple customers at once meaning new restrictions could affect all users of a data centre, even those not considered part of critical infrastructure.

“This could slow down innovation or make things more expensive for some businesses. To avoid these issues, data centres might need to set up separate areas just for critical infrastructure,” he said.

However, this could make it harder for important services to use cloud technology efficiently, potentially leading to higher costs. Organisations need to balance the benefits of security with added cost.

 “Vast amounts of information are stored and managed in data centres, so it’s about time the UK government declared them a critical national infrastructure,” said Camellia Chan, CEO and co-founder of Flexxon.

“This is especially important since the presence of such huge amounts of data – which is increasing with the rise in data-hungry applications like AI – is a massive motive for cybercriminals,” said Chan.

“The effects on business operations and continuity, as well as the financial losses of a cyber attack can be devastating – in 2023, the average cost of a data breach was $4.45 million.”